On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:22:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > >>>> Log: > > >>>> MFC: ipfilter 4.1.13 > > >>> > > >>>This begs for a question: if ipfilter can not be updated without > > >>>breaking the tree anymore, does it belong there in the first place? > > >> > > >>We could of course also get rid of the tree ;) > > >> > > >>-Guido > > > > > > Tree without ipfilter or ipfilter without tree - this is a > > > technicality. > > > > > > Seriously though, I wonder how ipfilter is being tested before being > > > checked in? Past two commits by you suggested that no testing was done > > > at all. > > > > > > > Missing an added file when doing a check-in is a forgivable mistake, > > especially since Guido isn't the author and likely doesn't have as deep > > of an understanding of the changes as the author does. And, I do highly > > appreciate that Guido is responding quickly to the problems. The > > process with ipfilter still isn't perfect, but it's definitely an > > improvement over the past. > > Yes, this is the first import Guido has done, and I think it has gone well > relatively speaking. Overall I think ipfilter imports will become less > eventful in the future than they have been in the past.
Thanks (also to Scott). It wasn't my first though :-( To all others: it was just a stupid mistake and I already apologized. -Guido _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
