On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 08:29 +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:08:09PM +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > sat 2006-05-10 19:08:09 UTC > [...] > > 1.1 +10 -0 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src__gwget_data.c (new) > > 1.2 +0 -10 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src_gwget_data.c (dead) > > About the patches filenaming under files/ we are trying to follow some > convention - see ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl, it's best to always > use that for generating the file names for new patches. > > The reason for not renaming all ports/*/*/files/* to conform to a single > convention is that the history would be lost.
Really, who cares? I'm not even sure Kris looks at patches history :-) The main reason for me is to avoid useless commits/traffic. Eventually we split those patches when they're changed. -- Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
