On 5/11/06, Vasil Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:08:09PM +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> sat 2006-05-10 19:08:09 UTC
[...]
> 1.1 +10 -0 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src__gwget_data.c (new)
> 1.2 +0 -10 ports/ftp/gwget/files/patch-src_gwget_data.c (dead)
About the patches filenaming under files/ we are trying to follow some
convention - see ports/Tools/scripts/splitpatch.pl, it's best to always
use that for generating the file names for new patches.
Thanks, I'll take a good look.
The reason for not renaming all ports/*/*/files/* to conform to a single
convention is that the history would be lost.
You should avoid renaming files this way (whatever the new and the
old names are) because the history is lost.
I understand this very clearly, the file had no history though,
it's just one missing header which should probable be pushed
upstream.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
