On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 08:36:38PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> Ah, thanks for the info.  What I meant though was it was
> packages-9-current instead of packages-10-current.

The takeaway is that we want people to use the packages-9-stable link
now.  (pkg_install in head has been fixed to point to that.)

> Ok, I'll remove the packages-10-current link then.

Well, not necessary, they will show up at some point.

mcl
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to