On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 07:30:50PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:18:34AM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > > [1] The 'packages-10-current' directory on the FTP site is empty, > > and packages-9-current is still being populated. > > packages-9-current is just a symlink to packages-9-stable, the "correct" > name, for now as an upgrade aid. >
Ah, thanks for the info. What I meant though was it was packages-9-current instead of packages-10-current. I seem to recall discussion on -ports@ regarding packages for 10-CURRENT, but I may have misinterpreted the problem. > We haven't decided about the packages-10-current builds yet; we may > need to move some tasks from pointyhat to pointyhat-west, but have > not yet figured out how to make all the symlinks work. > Ok, I'll remove the packages-10-current link then. Thanks Mark. Glen
pgpNRwHpY5tJq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
