On 09.11.2011 04:15, Doug Barton wrote: > On 11/08/2011 17:13, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> On 11/7/2011 4:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >>> Given that we already have 1.6 and 1.8 in ports, what's the value of >>> having this much older version? >>> >>> I didn't hear one single request to spare it when I deprecated it many >>> months ago, and it's been completely gone for over 3 weeks now. Have >>> users been asking for it to be returned? >> >> There is a reason why Digium still makes security releases of that >> software. And we still have 1.0 and 1.2 in the tree, so why not 1.4? >> IMHO, 1.4 should stay at least until 1.0 and 1.2 get booted. > > I'm only seeing 1.0, but in any case I don't see this as a reason to go > in the wrong direction. :) However ... >
1.0 is actually 10, the version after 1.8 (They changed the version numbering). I know it can be confusing, but i did not want to call the port asterisk100, if anybody has a better idea let me know. 1.4 is the oldest version we have in the tree and as long as it's kept up to date it should IMHO stay. 1.4 is a LTS release which will be supported until April of next year. This gives people a bit more time to migrate to the next LTS release, which is 1.8. Cheers, Florian _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
