On 11/08/2011 17:13, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> On 11/7/2011 4:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Given that we already have 1.6 and 1.8 in ports, what's the value of
>> having this much older version?
>>
>> I didn't hear one single request to spare it when I deprecated it many
>> months ago, and it's been completely gone for over 3 weeks now. Have
>> users been asking for it to be returned?
>
> There is a reason why Digium still makes security releases of that
> software. And we still have 1.0 and 1.2 in the tree, so why not 1.4?
> IMHO, 1.4 should stay at least until 1.0 and 1.2 get booted.
I'm only seeing 1.0, but in any case I don't see this as a reason to go
in the wrong direction. :) However ...
> I know at least few other companies that use 1.4 heavily and if you take
> just Sippy Software we have around 100 production installations that use
> 1.4 around the globe, so you have a very motivated maintainer.
... this sounds perfectly reasonable. Thanks for the explanation.
Doug
--
"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
"Too practical."
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
