On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Erwin Lansing <er...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:08:52AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote: > > On 2/22/11 10:48 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote: > > >> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit > > >> has been in the tree for some number of hours? > > > > > > Nope. For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that > > > window, the uploaded package would now be wrong. > > > > > > mcl > > > > What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2, > > or is a PORTEPOCH bump required? > > > Just reinstating it to PORTREVISON+1 should be good enough. There's no > need to get the, few, people that may have upgraded during the time to > upgrade again to +2. PKGVERSION needs to be the same or higher, it just > cannot go down. > > -erwin > How about to fix it? :-) > > -- > Erwin Lansing http://droso.org > Prediction is very difficult > especially about the future er...@freebsd.org > _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
