-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/22/11 10:48 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:18:14AM -0500, Greg Larkin wrote: >> Is it a good idea to decrement PORTREVISION after the previous commit >> has been in the tree for some number of hours? > > Nope. For instance, if a pointyhat run _had_ been started during that > window, the uploaded package would now be wrong. > > mcl
What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2, or is a PORTEPOCH bump required? Thank you, Greg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1j35QACgkQ0sRouByUApADAwCgzP5GIibqwO9Vq27OfpLO8ZXR jSQAoK/LJteMVb3ztlPnDNQpj+L6Sl9v =hm88 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
