On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:30:52PM +0800, wen heping wrote: > 2011/1/20 Alexey Dokuchaev <da...@freebsd.org>: > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 06:18:39PM +0800, wen heping wrote: > >> I do not think it is a wrong use when set LICENSE_FILE even it's a > >> standard one. What is its harm? It could at least help the user to find > >> the license file easily. > > > > Licenses are installed in the standard place anyways, so finding it > > Not all licenses are installed in the standard place, such as this > port www/moin.
I meant license texts that are installed via LICENSE framework are installed in the standard place. In the past we firmly tried to patch ports to not to install their own copies of GPL/etc. > Maybe, a more detailed guide of use bsd.license.mk should be created. I agree. I also have one suggestion about it: change default value of LICENSE_COMB to "multi" when more than one LICENSE is defined: right now, explicit LICENSE_COMB set to "dual" or "multi" is required, which is IMHO redundant in vast majority of cases. ./danfe _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
