On 08/08/2010 12:37, Rene Ladan wrote:
> Actually there is nothing wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS, I
> merely followed the PR. If you can convince the maintainer to revert
> factoring out SDL support, I'll be happy to make the corresponding commit.
Personally I think we need a lot more slave ports. OPTIONS are great for
people building the ports themselves, but if we're going to move to a
model dominated by packages then more slave ports are a good thing.
FWIW,
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
-- Pablo Picasso
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
