On 08-08-2010 21:30, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 05:59:36PM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote:
rene 2010-08-08 17:59:36 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile
Added files:
games/stonesoup/files patch-rltiles__Makefile
Log:
- Update to 0.7.1
- Split off SDL version into games/stonesoup-sdl slave port
- Note the new WWW site in pkg-descr
What was wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS? PR does not give
sufficient details.
We generally try to avoid creating slaves unless fairly strong reason
exist. Lots of ports optionally support SDL, imagine the numbers if we
factored it all out in to slaves.
Actually there is nothing wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS, I
merely followed the PR. If you can convince the maintainer to revert
factoring out SDL support, I'll be happy to make the corresponding commit.
Rene
--
http://www.rene-ladan.nl/
GPG fingerprint = ADBC ECCD EB5F A6B4 549F 600D 8C9E 647A E564 2BFC
(subkeys.pgp.net)
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
