In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dmitry Morozovsky writes: >Dear Poul-Henning, > >On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >PK> No MFC is anticipated. > >Provided current age of 7.* is short enough (and most users of it are aware of >possible API changes) why don't you think MFC to RELENG_7 is suitable?
If people see a reason for this, and want to take the battle, fine with me. Given what RELENG_7 has been through already, I'm not going to throw this particular nit under the wheel, in particular since I still don't know if the change (via the sendfile SF_SYNC it enables) makes any difference at all for the Varnish HTTP accellerator which drove this change. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
