On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:36:27PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > phk 2008-02-01 19:36:27 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > share/man/man9 mbuf.9 > sys/compat/ndis kern_ndis.c > sys/dev/cxgb cxgb_sge.c > sys/dev/cxgb/ulp/tom cxgb_cpl_socket.c > sys/dev/hatm if_hatm_intr.c > sys/dev/iscsi/initiator isc_soc.c > sys/dev/lge if_lge.c > sys/dev/msk if_msk.c > sys/dev/nfe if_nfe.c > sys/dev/patm if_patm_rx.c > sys/dev/sk if_sk.c > sys/dev/ti if_ti.c > sys/dev/wpi if_wpi.c > sys/kern kern_mbuf.c uipc_cow.c uipc_mbuf.c > uipc_syscalls.c > sys/pci if_wb.c > sys/sys mbuf.h param.h > Log: > Give MEXTADD() another argument to make both void pointers to the > free function controlable, instead of passing the KVA of the buffer > storage as the first argument. > > Fix all conventional users of the API to pass the KVA of the buffer > as the first argument, to make this a no-op commit. >
Because physically contiguous 9K jumbos are available I should have nuked local jumbo allocators used in msk(4)/nfe(4) and sk(4). If that happened you didn't need to touch these drivers. Sorry for that and thanks for your work. > Likely break the only non-convetional user of the API, after informing > the relevant committer. > > Update the mbuf(9) manual page, which was already out of sync on > this point. > > Bump __FreeBSD_version to 800016 as there is no way to tell how > many arguments a CPP macro needs any other way. > > This paves the way for giving sendfile(9) a way to wait for the > passed storage to have been accessed before returning. > > This does not affect the memory layout or size of mbufs. > > Parental oversight by: sam and rwatson. > > No MFC is anticipated. [...] -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
