>Thomas Peklak wrote: >Happily, it goes straight forward with relative widths. >See testpage: >http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/liquidfish.htm >No more problem! > > I beg to differ. The request was for a non-specified width, not a relative width, and there are certainly situations in which you need this. I had a similar situation with a menu that became too wide because of the number of elements. Luckily there was no CMS, but in case there was, and the menu could change, there's no way in telling the width beforehand, and a really dynamic stretching of individual elements is needed. This I have yet to see using CSS and no tables. In fact, I haven't ever seen it done using tables, since even the width of a table cell is either specified or relative to the table width (i.e. percentage).
I have seen an almost solution in this list a while ago, using display:table-cell, but it's a single horizontal nav-bar, and that doesn't mean it works in the suckerfish menus. Another one can be found here http://dev.l-c-n.com/inline-block/inline-list.php (btw: Philippe , shouldn't it be 'moz', not 'mox'?) Michiel ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
