Michiel van der Blonk wrote: >>Thomas Peklak [edit francky: must be: francky][/edit]wrote: >>Happily, it goes straight forward with relative widths. >>See testpage: >>http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/liquidfish.htm >>No more problem! >> >> >> > I beg to differ. The request was for a non-specified width, not a > relative width, and there are certainly situations in which you need > this. I had a similar situation with a menu that became too wide > because of the number of elements. Luckily there was no CMS, but in > case there was, and the menu could change, there's no way in telling > the width beforehand, and a really dynamic stretching of individual > elements is needed. This I have yet to see using CSS and no tables. In > fact, I haven't ever seen it done using tables, since even the width > of a table cell is either specified or relative to the table width > (i.e. percentage). > > I have seen an almost solution in this list a while ago, using > display:table-cell, but it's a single horizontal nav-bar, and that > doesn't mean it works in the suckerfish menus. Another one can be > found here http://dev.l-c-n.com/inline-block/inline-list.php (btw: > Philippe , shouldn't it be 'moz', not 'mox'?) > > Michiel
Indeed, now I read this, I should have said: "No more problem?" instead of "No more problem!". Thanks for correcting! I tried the "really dynamic stretching of individual elements" in a 2nd testpage <http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/liquidfish2.htm>. Mwoah! francky Off topic / translation in Dutch: "Klerepietjes, geen flauw idee dat dit ook nog aan de hand kon zijn!" ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
