Since the Last Update i got the issues that my Client jumps to 64tick on
every Connect.
Its cl_updaterate to be specific.

I can Set everything to 128 before connecting and literally while
connecting updaterate jumps to 64. That really weird and might be your
problem too.

Am 10.08.2016 01:39 schrieb "Spillvert.no" <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> yes, tried both -Tickrate 128 (which has always worked) , and now
> -tickrate 128
> Makes no difference.
>
> As previously mentioned, this is across different machines with different
> hardware. The only thing they have in common, is the OS. Which is Win 2008
> R2.
>
> Must be something related to one of the latest CS:GO patches and Windows.
>
> Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards
>
> *Henrik *
>
> Den 10. august 2016 kl. 01.11.29 +02.00 skrev Absurd Minds <
> [email protected]>:
>
> Have you tried -tickrate instead of -Tickrate?
>
> On Aug 9, 2016 7:00 PM, "Spillvert.no" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear members,
>
> I just joined this list. I was unable to access the archives, so I
> apologize if this has been asked recently:
>
> - For some reason, -Tickrate 128 in the startup parameter for all our
> servers (spread across different machines) are not doing the trick after
> the recent updates. All our servers are now running 64 tickrate, even with
> 128 tickrate defined in the startup/commandline.
>
> Is this a bug in CS:GO or something related to the windows servers
> (SRCDS.exe) ?
> The machines are running 2008 R2.
>
> Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards
>
> *Henrik*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csgo_servers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csgo_servers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
>
_______________________________________________
Csgo_servers mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers

Reply via email to