On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Ted Lemon wrote: > >If you sign the revocation certificate in the compromised key, then >the only way it can get revoked is if the owner of the key revokes it >or it's been compromised... > > _MelloN_ This is true, and that's a *sufficient* condition for a revocation. I don't know about you though, but my keyring exists in only two copies -- the Red Diskette and the Blue Diskette. If someone manages to grab both Diskettes, I won't be able to use the key to issue a revocation certificate. So I would prefer to work with a CA where it is not a *necessary* condition for a revocation. Bear
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers, and the Web of Trust David Honig
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers, and the Web of ... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers, and the Web... David Honig
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers, and the... Bill Frantz
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers, and the Web of ... Dan Geer
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers, and the Web... David Honig
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers, and the... P.J. Ponder
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers, and... David Honig
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers... Ray Dillinger
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers... Ted Lemon
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers... Ray Dillinger
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers... Derek Atkins
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers... Ted Lemon
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers... Ben Laurie
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers... Derek Atkins
- Re: reflecting on PGP, keyservers... Bodo Moeller
- More thoughts on Man in the Midd... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: More thoughts on Man in the ... Ben Laurie
- Re: More thoughts on Man in the ... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: More thoughts on Man in the ... Ben Laurie
- Re: More thoughts on Man in the ... Arnold G. Reinhold