Adam Spiers (aspi...@suse.com) wrote: > Rob Hirschfeld (rob_hirschf...@dell.com) wrote: > > Victor and I were kicking around the DB models a little more. The result > > was a further refinement/simplification for discussion. > > > > > > 1) Deployment is the top level thing. Basically, all the roles hang > > off the deployment (through the snapshot pointer). When a role has a > > prerequisite, that prerequisite is always resolved from within the > > deployment. The discussion image shows the role prereq chain in blue. > > Just checking you saw my feedback yesterday? I'm not yet convinced > how well this will work, but I'm very willing to be persuaded via > answers to my questions :)
Just as an aside, I'm sort of puzzled that we're going through another fundamental iteration of redesign of 2.0 at this point. Have the timescales for release shifted sufficiently far into the future to make this feasible? I haven't been too involved in those discussions so maybe I missed something, but I thought the goal was to aim for a 2.0 release relatively soon after Pebbles? _______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
