Hi, i took my results from this page (could use google translate) - https://www.overclockers.ru/lab/79286_4/testirovanie-termointerfejsov-v-poiskah-idealnoj-termopasty-ili-novinki-protiv-vcherashnih-chempionov.html >From your 1st test, Grizzly is better by 0.33 C , and from your 2nd test - by 0.31 C. Even if your tests are more correct, 10g of GC-Extreme at my local market cost the same as 5,55g of Grizzly -- that means, Grizzly is almost twice more expensive per 1g ; that is too big price difference for just 0.3 C . BTW it took me just 1 year to spend the first 10g, so had to buy another 10g....
2017-02-24 13:53 GMT+03:00 <[email protected]>: > This test here show the opposite: > http://extreme.pcgameshardware.de/attachments/831791d1434218266- > review-thermal-grizzly-kryonaut-hydronaut-auswertung.jpg > > The Gelid GC-Extreme is not as good as Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut also > listed by this test here: > http://overclocking.guide/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Tim_test_update1.png > > and also some other tests i had read. > > I dont know where you got this test you paste the results. I have never > seen a test result where the GC-extreme was better then the Thermal Grizzly > Kryonaut before. > > 5,55gramm of the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut cost about 15€. I dont think > that you should go there for the best price. You apply it once and 5,55g is > really much for a normal user. You would probably have enough for years. > > 23. Feb 2017 16:36 by [email protected]: > > Actually there is an even better non-conductive thermal paste (not liquid > metal) than "Grizzly" --- it is called " Gelid GC-Extreme ". Here is a > comparison from one review website that I screenshotted - > https://s4.postimg.org/qvp326pjx/Thermal_Grease.png . The difference > between them is not big, but I think in your case every degree counts. > Also, there is a packaging of Gelid GC-Extreme that is 10g - > http://gelidsolutions.com/thermal-solutions/thermal- > compound-gc-extreme-10g/ , this larger packaging gives a very affordable > price per 1g and will last for a long time ;) > > 2017-02-23 4:49 GMT+03:00 <[email protected]>: > >> Could you try out "Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut" or even liquid metal based >> products and report about the temperatures? It would be great if you could >> try out first the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and later then for example the >> Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut and report here. >> http://www.overclock.net/t/1588116/thermal-grizzly-conductonaut-73-w-mk >> >> Please clean up the surface before applying when possible with >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isopropyl_alcohol (its cheap and easy to >> get). >> >> 23. Feb 2017 01:28 by [email protected]: >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> Untested/unknown: If a ivy bridge CPU would work. The OEM bios didn't had >> support for those. >> >> >> Ivy Bridge works, have a 3740QM in mine. However, (quoting myself here): >> >> >> I'm running one albeit with an i7-3740qm - which is too much thermal >> load, runs up to 2.9 GHz for me reaching 93°C (70K to ambient) with fan set >> to disengaged, normal auto fan control works and allows up to 2.5 GHz. >> >> with that CPU RAPL does not work, thermald does but out-of-the-box >> settings gives me less performance than with fix limits, and I'm sure as >> hell not going to configure something with an xml config file. >> >> used to have a 2720m which worked without any issues AFAIR, but the >> 3740qm effectively gives me double the cores that are a little faster. >> >> >> Regards, Arian >> >> >> -- >> coreboot mailing list: [email protected] >> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >> > >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
