This test here show the opposite:
http://extreme.pcgameshardware.de/attachments/831791d1434218266-review-thermal-grizzly-kryonaut-hydronaut-auswertung.jpg
The Gelid GC-Extreme is not as good as Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut also listed by
this test here:
http://overclocking.guide/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Tim_test_update1.png
and also some other tests i had read.
I dont know where you got this test you paste the results. I have never seen a
test result where the GC-extreme was better then the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
before.
5,55gramm of the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut cost about 15€. I dont think that you
should go there for the best price. You apply it once and 5,55g is really much
for a normal user. You would probably have enough for years.
23. Feb 2017 16:36 by [email protected]:
> Actually there is an even better non-conductive thermal paste (not liquid
> metal) than "Grizzly" --- it is called " Gelid GC-Extreme ". Here is a
> comparison from one review website that I screenshotted - >
> https://s4.postimg.org/qvp326pjx/Thermal_Grease.png> . The difference
> between them is not big, but I think in your case every degree counts. Also,
> there is a packaging of Gelid GC-Extreme that is 10g - >
> http://gelidsolutions.com/thermal-solutions/thermal-compound-gc-extreme-10g/>
> , this larger packaging gives a very affordable price per 1g and will last
> for a long time ;)
>
> 2017-02-23 4:49 GMT+03:00 <> [email protected]> >:
>
>> >> Could you try out "Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut" or even liquid
>> metal based products and report about the temperatures? It would be great if
>> you could try out first the Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and later then for
>> example the Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut and report here.
>> http://www.overclock.net/t/1588116/thermal-grizzly-conductonaut-73-w-mk
>>
>> Please clean up the surface before applying when possible with >>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isopropyl_alcohol>> (its cheap and easy to
>> get).
>>
>> 23. Feb 2017 01:28 by >> [email protected]>> :
>>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Untested/unknown: If a ivy bridge CPU would work. The OEM bios didn't had
>>>> support for those.
>>>
>>> Ivy Bridge works, have a 3740QM in mine. However, (quoting myself here):
>>>>
>>>> I'm running one albeit with an i7-3740qm - which is too much thermal load,
>>>> runs up to 2.9 GHz for me reaching 93°C (70K to ambient) with fan set to
>>>> disengaged, normal auto fan control works and allows up to 2.5 GHz.
>>>>
>>>> with that CPU RAPL does not work, thermald does but out-of-the-box
>>>> settings gives me less performance than with fix limits, and I'm sure as
>>>> hell not going to configure something with an xml config file.
>>>>
>>>> used to have a 2720m which worked without any issues AFAIR, but the 3740qm
>>>> effectively gives me double the cores that are a little faster.
>>>
>>> Regards, Arian
>>
>> --
>> coreboot mailing list: >> [email protected]
>> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>>
>
>
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
