yeah, I know ... :-) I just wanted to get the full word in there ....
ron On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:22 PM Aaron Durbin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote: > > So we would submit new ACPI table types to the standards guys? Could we > get > > names like > > CORE > > BOOT > > CBFS > > We just need one table, and we can put whatever we want into it. It's > the equivalent of an HPET table, e.g. > > > > > ? > > > > ron > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM Patrick Georgi via coreboot > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> 2016-04-18 19:09 GMT+02:00 Vadim Bendebury <[email protected]>: > >> > It's been a while since I looked at it, but why not to pass all > >> > information through the coreboot table? (so that just one pointer > >> > needs to be shared through ACPI). > >> One reason for registering these things in ACPI is so that Linux > >> exports them properly via sysfs. /dev/mem is mostly non-functional in > >> newer kernel versions. > >> > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> -- > >> coreboot mailing list: [email protected] > >> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
