On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, ron minnich <[email protected]> wrote: > So we would submit new ACPI table types to the standards guys? Could we get > names like > CORE > BOOT > CBFS
We just need one table, and we can put whatever we want into it. It's the equivalent of an HPET table, e.g. > > ? > > ron > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM Patrick Georgi via coreboot > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 2016-04-18 19:09 GMT+02:00 Vadim Bendebury <[email protected]>: >> > It's been a while since I looked at it, but why not to pass all >> > information through the coreboot table? (so that just one pointer >> > needs to be shared through ACPI). >> One reason for registering these things in ACPI is so that Linux >> exports them properly via sysfs. /dev/mem is mostly non-functional in >> newer kernel versions. >> >> >> Patrick >> >> -- >> coreboot mailing list: [email protected] >> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
