I would really like this to be in the tree. It gives us a chance to do things in coreboot that go beyond C and assembly. So that's my $.02.
What harm would it do? ron On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:00 AM Nico Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 28.08.2015 17:51, schrieb Patrick Georgi: > > 2015-08-28 17:35 GMT+02:00 Nico Huber <[email protected]>: > >> I don't know if the real problem was that libpayload resides in > >> it's own repository. > > libpayload still shares a repo with coreboot. There were ideas to > > separate them, but that never materialized. > Ah, sorry. Got confused about that. What I meant is that they are not > sharing a (code) tree. > > >> But having simple device drivers in it's own place > >> seems to be a good idea, for me. > > If you want, I can setup a repo at coreboot.org, mirrored to > > github.com/coreboot, and we hook it up as submodule. > That would be convenient for external development... > > > That would place it somewhere below 3rdparty/ for consistency with the > > other submodules. > That might hinder people from taking part... > > > Your code, your decision. > I can't decide! why did I dare to ask :) > > Nico > > -- > M. Sc. Nico Huber > Senior Berater SINA-Softwareentwicklung > Netzwerk- & Client-Sicherheit / Network & Client Security > Division Öffentliche Auftraggeber / Public Authorities > secunet Security Networks AG > > Tel.: +49-201-5454-3635, Fax: +49-201-5454-1325 > E-Mail: [email protected] > Mergenthalerallee 77, 65760 Eschborn, Deutschland > www.secunet.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Sitz: Kronprinzenstraße 30, 45128 Essen, Deutschland > Amtsgericht Essen HRB 13615 > Vorstand: Dr. Rainer Baumgart (Vors.), Thomas Pleines > Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr. Peter Zattler > ______________________________________________________________________ >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
