I would say bring it in to the repo. We have assembly, we have our own C compiler even, so a higher level language hardly seems a bad idea. If this can make our code base better in some way, why not use it?
ron On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:55 AM Nico Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 21.08.2015 22:47, schrieb ron minnich: > > This sounds wonderful. I'm all for it. > Did you just kill any discussion with that line? :) > > Things live currently in a small library that I called `libsparkhw` > (came spontaneously, I don't care much about the name). It contains > some framework (Timer, I/O, Debugging) to do hardware stuff in SPARK, > plus the mentioned graphics initialization. I falter to push it directly > for inclusion into the coreboot repo. Maybe we want a separate reposi- > tory for it (like libpayload has)? It would also make it easier to use > it in other components (e.g. bootloaders and such, and of course our own > products where the code stems from). > > We have discussed the licensing and will push this under GPLv2 + later > if there are no reasonable concerns. > > Nico > > -- > M. Sc. Nico Huber > Senior Berater SINA-Softwareentwicklung > Netzwerk- & Client-Sicherheit / Network & Client Security > Division Öffentliche Auftraggeber / Public Authorities > secunet Security Networks AG > > Tel.: +49-201-5454-3635, Fax: +49-201-5454-1325 > E-Mail: [email protected] > Mergenthalerallee 77, 65760 Eschborn, Deutschland > www.secunet.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > > Sitz: Kronprinzenstraße 30, 45128 Essen, Deutschland > Amtsgericht Essen HRB 13615 > Vorstand: Dr. Rainer Baumgart (Vors.), Thomas Pleines > Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr. Peter Zattler > ______________________________________________________________________ >
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
