I've tried your suggestion. Building binutils on my 64-bit Fedora 20 system:
../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:325: unknown command `colophon'
../../../binutils-2.23.2/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo:336: unknown command `cygnus'
make[3]: *** [bfd.info] Error 1
I have texinfo-5.1-4.fc20.x86_64 installed.
On 05/22/2014 02:42 AM, David Hendricks wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Sean McNeil <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Are you bullding on 64-bit machine and have:
CONFIG_COMPILER_GCC=y
CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN=y
?
CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN should not be used in most cases. What does your
.xcompile file look like?
I'm building on a 64-bit host using the crossgcc toolchain. Try
running the buildgcc script in util/crossgcc, then rm -f .xcompile and
run make and see if that helps.
For reference, here are my .xcompile and .config files as well as the
output from make.
xcompile.txt
<https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNLVhwSHh4V0VWY28/edit?usp=drive_web>
config.txt
<https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNZ2hEcENPQ2kwSHM/edit?usp=drive_web>
make.txt
<https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNY1phV0c4c0MtM0U/edit?usp=drive_web>
arch/x86/exec.S:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous
definition
/*
^
arch/x86/exec.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/exec.S:43: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
arch/x86/exec.S:45: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
arch/x86/exec.S:52: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
arch/x86/exec.S:53: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
arch/x86/exec.S:54: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
arch/x86/exec.S:61: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
arch/x86/exec.S:62: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
arch/x86/exec.S:70: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push'
arch/x86/exec.S:73: Error: operand type mismatch for `call'
arch/x86/exec.S:81: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
arch/x86/exec.S:91: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
arch/x86/exec.S:92: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
arch/x86/exec.S:93: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
arch/x86/exec.S:97: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop'
make[2]: *** [build/arch/x86/exec.libc.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [libpayload] Error 2
make: *** [filo] Error 2
On 05/21/2014 10:36 AM, David Hendricks wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Sean McNeil
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
All the recent changes to how the compiler is defined have
now caused payloads like FILO and SeaBIOS to not build on
X86_64 machines. Is anyone working to fix this?
I just tried building images with each of those as payloads and
they seemed to compile fine for me. Try "rm -f .xcompile" before
compiling and see if that helps.
If that doesn't work, can you post more details such as the git
version you're on and output of "make" ?
--
David Hendricks (dhendrix)
Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
--
David Hendricks (dhendrix)
Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
