On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Sean McNeil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you bullding on 64-bit machine and have: > > CONFIG_COMPILER_GCC=y > CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN=y > > ? > CONFIG_ANY_TOOLCHAIN should not be used in most cases. What does your .xcompile file look like? I'm building on a 64-bit host using the crossgcc toolchain. Try running the buildgcc script in util/crossgcc, then rm -f .xcompile and run make and see if that helps. For reference, here are my .xcompile and .config files as well as the output from make. xcompile.txt<https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNLVhwSHh4V0VWY28/edit?usp=drive_web> config.txt<https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNZ2hEcENPQ2kwSHM/edit?usp=drive_web> make.txt<https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/file/d/0BwyScGuaZ2uNY1phV0c4c0MtM0U/edit?usp=drive_web> > > arch/x86/exec.S:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition > /* > ^ > arch/x86/exec.S: Assembler messages: > arch/x86/exec.S:43: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push' > arch/x86/exec.S:45: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push' > arch/x86/exec.S:52: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push' > arch/x86/exec.S:53: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push' > arch/x86/exec.S:54: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push' > arch/x86/exec.S:61: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push' > arch/x86/exec.S:62: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push' > arch/x86/exec.S:70: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `push' > arch/x86/exec.S:73: Error: operand type mismatch for `call' > arch/x86/exec.S:81: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop' > arch/x86/exec.S:91: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop' > arch/x86/exec.S:92: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop' > arch/x86/exec.S:93: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop' > arch/x86/exec.S:97: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `pop' > make[2]: *** [build/arch/x86/exec.libc.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [libpayload] Error 2 > make: *** [filo] Error 2 > > > > On 05/21/2014 10:36 AM, David Hendricks wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Sean McNeil <[email protected]>wrote: > >> All the recent changes to how the compiler is defined have now caused >> payloads like FILO and SeaBIOS to not build on X86_64 machines. Is anyone >> working to fix this? >> > > I just tried building images with each of those as payloads and they > seemed to compile fine for me. Try "rm -f .xcompile" before compiling and > see if that helps. > > If that doesn't work, can you post more details such as the git version > you're on and output of "make" ? > > -- > David Hendricks (dhendrix) > Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc. > > > -- David Hendricks (dhendrix) Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
