* Scott Duplichan <[email protected]> [101210 18:13]: > Peter Stuge wrote: > > ]I have a greater problem with this; > ] > ]It assumes that one image will always go into one and the same size > ]of flash chip. > > I think I understand your concern. It is convenient to be able to > use a bigger chip to test a smaller image. But limiting the decode > size will only block access to the usused portion of the chip, correct?
One of the original design ideas of CBFS (or LAR in v3) was that we can build a single image, with, say 256KB, and resize that same image later on in case someone wants to put in fallback/normal, a linux kernel payload or stuff like that. Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
