core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Lois Foltan
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v8] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects [v9] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v2] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v3] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v4] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v5] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v5] Artem
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v6] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v7] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v8] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Viktor Klang
• [External] : Proposal: track zlib memory usage in Native Memory Tracking Charles Connell
  • Re: [External] : Proposal: track zlib memory usage in Native Memory Tracking Alan Bateman
  • Re: [External] : Proposal: track zlib memory usage in Native Memory Tracking Charles Connell
• Integrated: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8360595: OOM in java/foreign/TestUpcallStress.java Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8360595: OOM in java/foreign/TestUpcallStress.java Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8360595: OOM in java/foreign/TestUpcallStress.java Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8360595: OOM in java/foreign/TestUpcallStress.java Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8360595: OOM in java/foreign/TestUpcallStress.java Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8360595: OOM in java/foreign/TestUpcallStress.java Jorn Vernee
• RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v4] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v5] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v6] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v6] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v6] Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v6] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v7] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v8] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v8] Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v8] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v8] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v9] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v9] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v10] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v10] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v10] Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows [v10] duke
  • Integrated: 8385024: `JLI_Open()` doesn't correctly handle paths longer than MAXPATH on Windows Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8385018: Consistently escape CLDR resources Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8385018: Consistently escape CLDR resources Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8385018: Consistently escape CLDR resources Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8385018: Consistently escape CLDR resources Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows duke
  • Integrated: 8384997: "Unrecognized system!" failures on MSys2/Windows Ashay Rane
• Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v8] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v8] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v8] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v8] Coleen Phillimore
• Integrated: 8296183: jndiprovider.properties contains properties pointing to non-existing classes Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8296183: jndiprovider.properties contains properties pointing to non-existing classes [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8296183: jndiprovider.properties contains properties pointing to non-existing classes [v7] Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v39] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v4] Ashay Rane
• Withdrawn: 8379832: Fix Float/Double NaN constant pool entry equality and deduplication duke
• RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions Roman Marchenko
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions Roman Marchenko
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions Roman Marchenko
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions [v2] Roman Marchenko
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8383867: File.getCanonicalPath drops backslash from UNC path with directory junctions Roman Marchenko
• RFR: 8384648: LazyConstantTest::interruptStatusIsPreservedForComputingThread fails Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384648: LazyConstantTest::interruptStatusIsPreservedForComputingThread fails Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8384648: LazyConstantTest::interruptStatusIsPreservedForComputingThread fails Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8384648: LazyConstantTest::interruptStatusIsPreservedForComputingThread fails [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8384648: LazyConstantTest::interruptStatusIsPreservedForComputingThread fails [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Integrated: 8384648: LazyConstantTest::interruptStatusIsPreservedForComputingThread fails Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v38] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8374364: TestCgroupMetrics.java fails when cpuset unmounted [v13] SendaoYan
• RFR: 8381710: Avoid using lambdas in ModuleBootstrap in AOT training mode Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8381710: Avoid using lambdas in ModuleBootstrap in AOT training mode Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8381710: Avoid using lambdas in ModuleBootstrap in AOT training mode Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8381710: Avoid using lambdas in ModuleBootstrap in AOT training mode Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8381710: Avoid using lambdas in ModuleBootstrap in AOT training mode Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8381710: Avoid using lambdas in ModuleBootstrap in AOT training mode Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v25] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v25] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v25] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v25] Chen Liang
• Withdrawn: 8379446: Annotation to mark intended bootstrap method declarations duke
• Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v7] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v7] Thomas Stuefe
• Re: RFR: 8322256: Define and document GZIPInputStream concatenated stream semantics [v12] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8322256: Define and document GZIPInputStream concatenated stream semantics [v12] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8322256: Define and document GZIPInputStream concatenated stream semantics [v12] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8322256: Define and document GZIPInputStream concatenated stream semantics [v12] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8322256: Define and document GZIPInputStream concatenated stream semantics [v12] Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8322256: Define and document GZIPInputStream concatenated stream semantics [v12] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8322256: Define and document GZIPInputStream concatenated stream semantics [v12] Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384804: JMX remote bootstrap tests fail on Windows Ashay Rane
• RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Withdrawn: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views duke
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v77] Doug Lea
• Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi

• Earlier messages
• Later messages