On Thu, 5 Nov 2026 19:31:47 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @vnkozlov @jatin-bhateja @vpaprotsk @aprilivy Thanks again for all your >> reviews and suggestions. >> >> Sorry for the slight detour, while analyzing SPECjvm performance, I found >> that DESCrypt.cipherBlock and the DESede block encrypt/decrypt paths do not >> appear to have corresponding HotSpot intrinsics. I built x86-64 C2 intrinsic >> prototypes for both paths and saw encouraging gains. >> >> I’d like to move this work forward as a separate change. Would any of you be >> willing to help get two JBS issues filed, one for DES and one for DESede, or >> point me to the right person to ask? I can put together a short scope note >> with the benchmark setup, results, and test plan first, so it’s easier to >> judge whether this is worth pursuing. >> >> Thanks! > >> Would any of you be willing to help get two JBS issues filed, one for DES >> and one for DESede > > Send me email with title and description for these RFEs and I will file them. @vnkozlov Thanks, I’ve sent the titles and descriptions for both RFEs to [email protected]. Please let me know if you don’t receive the email or need any additional information. > > Would any of you be willing to help get two JBS issues filed, one for DES > > and one for DESede > > Send me email with title and description for these RFEs and I will file them. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33338#issuecomment-6757337885
