On Fri, 30 Oct 2026 15:27:50 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @vpaprotsk hi, could you kindly be this PR's reviewer? > >> @vpaprotsk hi, could you kindly be this PR's reviewer? > > Yep, I am looking. Gimme a few days. Hi @vpaprotsk, thanks for the detailed review. I initially left the naming unchanged to limit churn, but I agree it needed cleanup. I’ve now improved the register and label names, added comments for the AVX2 iteration logic and so on. The AVX-512 computation remains unchanged; only its naming and comments were updated. The remaining follow-up items will be addressed in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8396416. Could you take another look and let me know if you have any other comments or whether the current changes look acceptable to you? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33338#issuecomment-6629695712
