On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 20:02:52 GMT, Roger Riggs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> To me, it seems odd to add only the `byte[]` variant but not other primitive >> type arrays (as with the `equals` methods). You also most likely need a >> [CSR](https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/csr). > >> To me, it seems odd to add only the `byte[]` variant but not other primitive >> type arrays (as with the `equals` methods). You also most likely need a >> [CSR](https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/csr). > > The only use case presented was for byte array subranges. While it seems > obvious to repeat the pattern for the other types, they might never get used > and would just create more surface area to maintain. The Arrays class is > already huge. @RogerRiggs @pavelrappo Thank your for the commons, I think that make sense, updated the Javadoc. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24128#issuecomment-4005587251
