On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 17:33:30 GMT, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that would be too much to try to put in the InterruptedException > class description but we could potentially extend the sentence in the Thread > Interruption section to include the case where someone chooses to add the > InterruptedException as a suppressed exception. Fair enough. > I would prefer not get into further guidance for unwrapping, e.g. catch > FooException, get the InterruptedException cause, clear the interrupted > status before re-throwing the cause. I agree. Besides, there's no cookie-cutter guidance for cases like that. For example, some exceptions in an exception graph can originate in another thread. It would be a mistake to interrupt one thread because it got an exception that is linked to InterruptedException from another thread. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28216#discussion_r2515140262
