On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:04:03 GMT, Kieran Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @kieran-farrell Is there a last-minute plan to make use of `nextLong()` as >> suggested by @RogerRiggs? >> Otherwise looks good > > Thanks @rgiulietti, the need for a nextLong() API existed whenwe were using > higher percision bits in the first half of the UUID, there fore only required > the second half (long) to be generated with random bits, however we are no > longer using higher percision bits in the first ling, and instead using > random bits in their place, so we would need to call nextLong twice and > overwrite with the timestamp etc. which results in a large perfomance dec. This thread can be resolved. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25303#discussion_r2389015014
