> Some type parameter declaration signatures in class and method generic 
> signatures, such as `<T:R:>`, are valid per JVMS but are not accepted by 
> either the ClassFile or the legacy core reflection parser. (Javac doesn't 
> generate these because it always generates an Object upper bound) They can be 
> constructed by the ClassFile API models. So it makes sense to support their 
> parsing as supported by JVMS and our API model.

Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since 
the last revision:

 - 8368331: ClassFile Signature parsing fails for type parameter with no 
supertype
 - More fixes
 - Fix bad docs and add more to clarify class type sig
 - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into 
fix/cf-classtypesig-factory-classdesc
 - Fix links
 - More bugs
 - 8368050: Validation missing in ClassFile signature factories

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27439/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27439/files/0c4c58b6..0c4c58b6

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=27439&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=27439&range=00-01

  Stats: 0 lines in 0 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27439.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27439/head:pull/27439

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27439

Reply via email to