On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:46:59 GMT, Volkan Yazici <vyaz...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> `NoRepl`-suffixed `String` methods denote methods that do not replace >> invalid characters, but throw `CharacterCodingException` on encounter. This >> behavior cannot easily be derived from the method footprints, has been a >> source of confusion for maintainers, and is not uniformly adopted, e.g., >> `newStringUTF8NoRepl()` and `getBytesUTF8NoRepl()` does *not* throw `CCE`. >> This PR replaces the `NoRepl` suffix with `NoReplacement` in method names >> and consistently uses `throws CCE` in method footprints. > > Volkan Yazici has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Improve "sneaky throws" > - Improve comment style Marked as reviewed by liach (Reviewer). src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/String.java line 890: > 888: > 889: private static <E extends Exception> byte[] encodeWithEncoder( > 890: Charset cs, byte coder, byte[] val, Class<E> exceptionClass) Since `exceptionClass` is a dummy argument that can't actually control the type of exception thrown by this method, that it being null or not is the only thing that matters, I recommend documenting/commenting about this fact, as this is otherwise potentially confusing. Maybe a name to indicate this nature (I came up with `replacementSwitch` but this is for sure horrible) would help too I guess? ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26413#pullrequestreview-3162113328 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26413#discussion_r2305538047