On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 11:40:56 GMT, Leo Korinth <lkori...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> while not multiplying a 10x factor with four resulting in a 40x factor.

Why is that undesirable? The base is `(HOLD_TARGET_TIME + 30000)  * 4` and the 
timeout-factor changes that linearly. Using `max(..., 4)` here may come as a 
surprise to end users, IMO.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26749#discussion_r2298163658

Reply via email to