On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:26:22 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> True, though would you prefer to change the comment ("by default this method
>> throws... and is overridden by directory subclasses...") or the
>> implementation of things like `getChildNames()` so they call `isDirectory()`
>> ?
>>
>> Personally I dislike this "test and call" approach and would rather have
>> restructured the API to be more object-oriented, and have callers use a more
>> structured dispatch mechanism (but this would incur cost of lambdas etc.),
>> but that's a really disruptive change.
>>
>> Alternatively a type token/enum of some sort could be used to define node
>> type. This is all internal/trusted API though, so I'm happy with trusting
>> that things "do what they say" (it's going to be really obvious if something
>> claims to be a directory and then throws when asks for its child names, and
>> that's almost exclusively why anyone calls isDirectory() to start with).
>>
>> So in summary, apart from maybe tweaking the comment slightly, I think this
>> is fine as is.
>
> I would change the comment.
Comment changed, though note that I can't @link to Directory because it's a
non-visible type.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26054#discussion_r2248026262
