On Wed, 7 May 2025 15:46:16 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti <rgiulie...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Did you make sure that the existing tests also cover the `unsignedLongPow()` > sufficiently well? @rgiulietti There are already the tests for `BigInteger`'s [pow](https://github.com/fabioromano1/jdk/blob/BigInteger-nth-root/test/jdk/java/math/BigInteger/BigIntegerTest.java#L219), since the code of `unsignedLongPow()` is basically equivalent to that one in the current implementation. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24690#issuecomment-2859155908
