On 15/03/2025 17:58, Markus KARG wrote:
Chen,

thank you for sharing your opinion!

Thinking about what you wrote about the "trifecta" complexity, I think it might be better to restart my idea from scratch:

As explained in my original proposal (https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2024-December/137807.html), the actual driver for my proposal was to provide a StringWriter alternative which solves two main problems: It shall prevent String copies, and it shall be non-synchronized.

What comes into mind is: Writer.of(StringBuilder).

While compared to Appendable this signature is much less flexible, it also makes less headaches, but solved in fact those 99% of cases that triggered this whole idea: It does not create String copies, and it is non-synchronized. What this writer would simply, simply would be routing all incoming "append" and "write" calls down to the provided string builder.

Hence, kindly asking for comments on this updated idea: WDYT about Writer.of(StringBuilder)?

I think the main issue with Writer.of(SB) is that the usages would requiring hopping between SB, Writer, then back to SB. That is, you start accumulating characters in the SB, then wrap it with a Writer to write/append characters with a different API, be careful to flush/close so that all characters get to the SB, then back to the SB to append more before creating the String. That seems a bit fragile and very different to the decoration/wrapping when using reader/writers.

You've made it clear that your motivation is performance and avoiding the synchronization and internal buffer of StringWriter. I think it would be useful if you could expand a bit on the pain points. Maye this is about rehabilitating StringWriter or maybe it's about making it easier and more efficient to bridge between StringWriter and other Appendables. Expanding more on the problem might help to give you some suggestions and directions to explore and prototype.

-Alan

Reply via email to