On Thu, 1 May 2025 08:45:06 GMT, Markus KARG <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This Pull Request proposes an implementation for >> [JDK-8343110](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8343110): Adding the new >> method `public void getChars(int srcBegin, int srcEnd, char[] dst, int >> dstBegin)` to the `CharSequence` interface, providing a **bulk-read** >> facility including a default implementation iterating over `charAt(int)`. >> >> In addition, this Pull Request proposes to replace the implementation of >> `Reader.of(CharSequence).read(char[] cbuf, int off, int len)` to invoke >> `CharSequence.getChars(next, next + n, cbuf, off)` instead of utilizing >> pattern matching for switch. Also, this PR proposes to implement >> `CharBuffer.getChars(int srcBegin, int srcEnd, char[] dst, int dstBegin)` as >> an alias for `CharBuffer.get(srcBegin, dst, dstBegin, srcEnd - srcBegin)`. >> >> To ensure quality... >> * ...the method signature and JavaDocs are adapted from >> `AbstractStringBuilder.getChars(...)`. >> * ...this PR relies upon the existing tests for `Reader.of(CharSequence)`, >> as these provide sufficient coverage of all changes introduced by this PR. > > Markus KARG has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Applied proposal by Daniel: If there's no change to this file the copyright > year update could be reverted? I know all that. As I said, I am using git since decades, so I know *lots* of alternative ways to update branches and even proposed the one you want, so I just needed to know *which of those alternatives* (not the exact commands) you *want*. Don't know why posted all that, as the question was already solved by you?! 🤔 ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21730#issuecomment-2855388011
