On Mon, 5 May 2025 13:41:22 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> This sketch shows how "Stable Updaters" can be used to create stable > computations of `@Stable` fields. Only one updater is needed per class, > similar to `AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater`. Benchmarks: Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units StableUpdatersBenchmark.base avgt 10 0.715 ± 0.026 ns/op StableUpdatersBenchmark.updater avgt 10 0.716 ± 0.079 ns/op Which shows the updater has the same performance as imperative code which is good. Updated benchmarks: Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units StableUpdatersBenchmark.base avgt 10 0.838 ± 0.041 ns/op StableUpdatersBenchmark.baseStatic avgt 10 0.759 ± 0.088 ns/op StableUpdatersBenchmark.updater avgt 10 0.888 ± 0.086 ns/op StableUpdatersBenchmark.updaterStatic avgt 10 0.753 ± 0.017 ns/op StableUpdatersBenchmark.uri avgt 10 0.781 ± 0.206 ns/op StableUpdatersBenchmark.uriStatic avgt 10 0.724 ± 0.048 ns/op ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25040#issuecomment-2851073331 PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25040#issuecomment-2853800652
