On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:52:46 GMT, Brent Christian <bchri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> But if there's concern that we won't reach the needed state during ForceGC's > default timeout, I can call ForceGC.waitFor() with a longer timeout. 60s > ought to be plenty. I think using 60 seconds as a timeout for `ForceGC` would be good. Also just for debugging, in case the test fails for some intermittent reason, I think it would be a good idea to print the return value of the `ForceGC` call when it returns `false` indicating that the condition didn't satisfy after the wait time. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24143#discussion_r2015400328
