On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 06:37:08 GMT, Hannes Greule <hgre...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Remove the intrinsicData field. We can obtain this from the customized MH 
>> when we spin ultra-customized lambda forms. In the long run, we aim to 
>> remove this intrinsic if there is no regression for call site sharing.
>> 
>> The existing tableSwitch combinator's LF is unnecessarily complex. This 
>> patch also simplifies the tableSwitch combinator.
>> 
>> Note that I was forced to add `@ForceInline` on immutable lists due to 
>> regressions in `MethodHandlesTableSwitchRandom` with `sorted == true`, which 
>> eliminates the regression. Otherwise, all benchmark results are the same. 
>> Tested java/lang/invoke.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.java line 7659:
> 
>> 7657:         if (!(expectedType.parameterCount() >= 1) || 
>> expectedType.parameterType(0) != int.class)
>> 7658:             throw new IllegalArgumentException(
>> 7659:                 "Case actions must have int as leading parameter: " + 
>> caseActions);
> 
> As you're already touching this: `expectedType` is the default case, but it's 
> not printed here. This can lead to very confusing output if all caseActions 
> have a leading int parameter but the defaultCase hasn't.

True, why did this insufficent message slip through the original reviews 🤔

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23763#discussion_r1969067288

Reply via email to