On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:31:28 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The Class.getModifiers() method is implemented as a native method in 
>> java.lang.Class to access a field that we've calculated when creating the 
>> mirror.  The field is final after that point. The VM doesn't need it 
>> anymore, so there's no real need for the jdk code to call into the VM to get 
>> it.  This moves the field to Java and removes the intrinsic code.  I 
>> promoted the compute_modifiers() functions to return int since that's how 
>> java.lang.Class uses the value.  It should really be an unsigned short 
>> though.
>> 
>> There's a couple of JMH benchmarks added with this change.  One does show 
>> that for array classes for non-bootstrap class loader, this results in one 
>> extra load which in a long loop of just that, is observable.  I don't think 
>> this is real life code. The other benchmarks added show no regression.
>> 
>> Tested with tier1-8.
>
> Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Make compute_modifiers return u2.

Thank you Vladimir for encouraging me to continue this change.  I removed the 
??? and hid the modifiers field for reflection as suggested in this PR.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22652#issuecomment-2641339406

Reply via email to