On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:11:33 GMT, Sergey Chernyshev <schernys...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> Cgroup V1 subsustem fails to initialize mounted controllers properly in 
>> certain cases, that may lead to controllers left undetected/inactive. We 
>> observed the behavior in CloudFoundry deployments, it affects also host 
>> systems.
>> 
>> The relevant /proc/self/mountinfo line is
>> 
>> 
>> 2207 2196 0:43 
>> /system.slice/garden.service/garden/good/2f57368b-0eda-4e52-64d8-af5c 
>> /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct ro,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime master:25 - 
>> cgroup cgroup rw,cpu,cpuacct
>> 
>> 
>> /proc/self/cgroup:
>> 
>> 
>> 11:cpu,cpuacct:/system.slice/garden.service/garden/bad/2f57368b-0eda-4e52-64d8-af5c
>> 
>> 
>> Here, Java runs inside containerized process that is being moved cgroups due 
>> to load balancing.
>> 
>> Let's examine the condition at line 64 here 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/55a7cf14453b6cd1de91362927b2fa63cba400a1/src/hotspot/os/linux/cgroupV1Subsystem_linux.cpp#L59-L72
>> It is always FALSE and the branch is never taken. The issue was spotted 
>> earlier by @jerboaa in 
>> [JDK-8288019](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288019). 
>> 
>> The original logic was intended to find the common prefix of `_root`and 
>> `cgroup_path` and concatenate the remaining suffix to the `_mount_point` 
>> (lines 67-68). That could lead to the following results: 
>> 
>> Example input
>> 
>> _root = "/a"
>> cgroup_path = "/a/b"
>> _mount_point = "/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct"
>> 
>> 
>> result _path
>> 
>> "/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct/b"
>> 
>> 
>> Here, cgroup_path comes from /proc/self/cgroup 3rd column. The man page 
>> (https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/cgroups.7.html#NOTES) for control 
>> groups states:
>> 
>> 
>> ...
>>        /proc/pid/cgroup (since Linux 2.6.24)
>>               This file describes control groups to which the process
>>               with the corresponding PID belongs.  The displayed
>>               information differs for cgroups version 1 and version 2
>>               hierarchies.
>>               For each cgroup hierarchy of which the process is a
>>               member, there is one entry containing three colon-
>>               separated fields:
>> 
>>                   hierarchy-ID:controller-list:cgroup-path
>> 
>>               For example:
>> 
>>                   5:cpuacct,cpu,cpuset:/daemons
>> ...
>>               [3]  This field contains the pathname of the control group
>>                    in the hierarchy to which the process belongs. This
>>                    pathname is relative to the mount point of the
>>                    hierarchy.
>> 
>> 
>> This explicitly states the "pathname is relative t...
>
> Sergey Chernyshev has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   added details in the log message

Hi Jonas,
The PR is now ready and under review. I couldn't get back to it earlier due
to ongoing work. Apologies for the delay.

Am Fr., 24. Jan. 2025 um 11:07 Uhr schrieb Jonas ***@***.***>:

> Hi @sercher <https://github.com/sercher> and @jerboaa
> <https://github.com/jerboaa> may I ask what the current state of this PR
> is, because we are waiting for the bug fix?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21808#issuecomment-2612141043>, or
> unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQZGCH4R4TSK7UERVL73Y32MIGHBAVCNFSM6AAAAABQ6PM7YSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMJSGE2DCMBUGM>
> .
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21808#issuecomment-2613597123

Reply via email to