On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:12:36 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Changes for [JEP draft: Structured Concurrency (Fifth 
>> Preview)](https://openjdk.org/jeps/8340343). The JEP isn't on the technical 
>> roadmap yet. The proposal is to re-preview the API with some changes, 
>> specifically:
>> 
>> - A 
>> [StructuredTaskScope](https://download.java.net/java/early_access/loom/docs/api/java.base/java/util/concurrent/StructuredTaskScope.html)
>>  is now opened with a static factory method instead of a constructor.  Once 
>> opened, the API usage is unchanged: fork subtasks individually, join them as 
>> a unit, process outcome, and close.
>> - In conjunction with moving to using a static open method, policy and 
>> desired outcome is now selected by specifying a Joiner to the open method 
>> rather than extending STS. A Joiner handles subtask completion and produces 
>> the result for join to return. Joiner.onComplete is the equivalent of 
>> overriding handleComplete previously. This change means that the subclasses 
>> ShutdownOnFailure and ShutdownOnSuccess are removed, replaced by factory 
>> methods on Joiner to get an equivalent Joiner.
>> - The join method is changed to return the result or throw 
>> STS.FailedException, replacing the need for an API in subclasses to obtain 
>> the outcome. This removes the hazard that was forgetting to call 
>> throwIfFailed to propagate exceptions.
>> - Configuration that was provided with parameters for the constructor is 
>> changed so that can be provided by a configuration function.
>> - joinUntil is replaced by allowing a timeout be configured by the 
>> configuration function. This allows the timeout to apply the scope rather 
>> than the join method.
>>  
>> The underlying implementation is unchanged except that ThreadFlock.shutdown 
>> and wakeup methods are no longer confined. The STS API implementation moves 
>> to non-public StructuedTaskScopeImpl because STS is now an interface. A 
>> non-public Joiners class is added with the built-in Joiner implementations.
>
> Alan Bateman has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains eight commits:
> 
>  - Fix link
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8342486
>  - Sync up impl/tests form loom repo
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8342486
>  - Pull latest API docs + impl from loom repo
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8342486
>  - Sync up from loom repo
>  - Initial commit

src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/Joiners.java line 74:

> 72:             Subtask.State state = subtask.state();
> 73:             if (state == Subtask.State.UNAVAILABLE) {
> 74:                 throw new IllegalArgumentException();

Suggestion to add IAE exception message.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/Joiners.java line 121:

> 119:             Subtask.State state = subtask.state();
> 120:             if (state == Subtask.State.UNAVAILABLE) {
> 121:                 throw new IllegalArgumentException();

Suggestion to add IAE exception message

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21934#discussion_r1922434029
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21934#discussion_r1922433639

Reply via email to