On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 09:53:18 GMT, Severin Gehwolf <sgehw...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review these changes to jpackage in light of [JEP >> 493](https://openjdk.org/jeps/493). When this feature is enabled, then some >> of the `jpackage` tests fail. The failures fall into the following >> categories: >> >> - `ALL-DEFAULT` notion from `jpackage` which includes all modules that >> export an API, which includes `jdk.jlink`, which is prevented from being >> included when linking from the run-time image (see the [JEP >> 493](https://openjdk.org/jeps/493) restrictions). The proposal is to change >> module resolution from `Configuration.resolveAndBind()` to >> `Configuration.resolve()`. I.e. don't perform service binding which is in >> line what [JEP 392](https://openjdk.org/jeps/392) and [JEP >> 343](https://openjdk.org/jeps/343) claim. That is, this patch brings the >> implementation aligned to what it says on the JEPs >> - `ALL-MODULE-PATH` changes: `BasicTest.java` verifies the `--add-modules` >> argument to `jpackage`. Using `ALL-MODULE-PATH` for JDK modules won't be >> supported for JEP 493-enabled builds. So I've changed this test to skip the >> test using `ALL-MODULE-PATH` when we have such an enabled build. Other >> tests, such as `RuntimeImageTest.java` and >> `RuntimeImageSymbolicLinksTest.java` tests verify something else not related >> to `ALL-MODULE-PATH` or `--add-modules`. It seems more appropriate to use >> the smaller set of modules to use for the runtime JDK image. >> - `JLinkOptionsTest.java`: That test verifies options passed to `jlink` via >> the `ToolProvider` API. For some reason, it uses `--bind-services` >> extensively and that - in turn - and, when not limited with the >> `--limit-modules` option as well, will include `jdk.jlink` in the resulting >> image, again running afoul the JEP 493 restriction of not allowing >> `jdk.jlink` for now. I propose to use suitable options including >> `--limit-modules` which would then no longer include `jdk.jlink` in the >> runtime image and the link from a run-time image works as well. These >> changes depend on [JDK-8345573](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345573) >> for it to work fully. >> >> Testing: >> - [x] GHA >> - [x] running tests in `test/jdk/tools/jpackage` on a JEP 493 enabled JDK. >> As far as I could see the failures that I was seeing weren't any more >> related to JEP 493 (some RPM requirements showing up that it didn't expect >> to). >> >> Thoughts? Opinions? > > Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Use TKit.trace() Marked as reviewed by asemenyuk (Reviewer). Looks good. Thank you! ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22644#pullrequestreview-2508905642 PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22644#issuecomment-2548483457
