On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 23:27:38 GMT, Scott Marlow <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> I made a quick test for this, but you might not want to include it if you >>> aim to backport this improvement to LTS releases as it uses the >>> recently-finalized ClassFile API. >> >> Excellent, I'm +1000 for adding your test, thank you very much for creating >> it! Can you create a pr against >> https://github.com/scottmarlow/jdk/tree/AnnotationParser_should_include_container_Duplicate_annotation_error >> or add the commit directly to this pr? > >> @scottmarlow I plan to do a separate PR to add this test; so we get a clean >> commit that can be easily backported to 24 and existing LTS versions. > > Thanks, that sounds great as well! > > Thanks to you and others in the community that helped me with this! > @scottmarlow If you want this patch committed, you need to issue the > `/integrate` command yourself. Thanks, will look at https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/SKARA/Pull+Request+Commands#PullRequestCommands-/integrate for guidance on what I need to do. In general, I'd like to see the change merged and back ported to LTS branches as well. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22581#issuecomment-2528104024