On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 23:27:38 GMT, Scott Marlow <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> I made a quick test for this, but you might not want to include it if you 
>>> aim to backport this improvement to LTS releases as it uses the 
>>> recently-finalized ClassFile API.
>> 
>> Excellent, I'm +1000 for adding your test, thank you very much for creating 
>> it!  Can you create a pr against 
>> https://github.com/scottmarlow/jdk/tree/AnnotationParser_should_include_container_Duplicate_annotation_error
>>  or add the commit directly to this pr?
>
>> @scottmarlow I plan to do a separate PR to add this test; so we get a clean 
>> commit that can be easily backported to 24 and existing LTS versions.
> 
> Thanks, that sounds great as well!
> 
> Thanks to you and others in the community that helped me with this!

> @scottmarlow If you want this patch committed, you need to issue the 
> `/integrate` command yourself.

Thanks, will look at 
https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/SKARA/Pull+Request+Commands#PullRequestCommands-/integrate
 for guidance on what I need to do.  In general, I'd like to see the change 
merged and back ported to LTS branches as well.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22581#issuecomment-2528104024

Reply via email to