> In addition to the goals, scope, motivation, specification and requirement > notes in [JDK-8315487](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315487), we would > like to describe the most relevant decisions taken during the implementation > of this enhancement. These notes are organized by feature, may encompass more > than one file or code segment, and are aimed to provide a high-level view of > this PR. > > ## ProvidersFilter > > ### Filter construction (parser) > > The providers filter is constructed from a string value, taken from either a > system or a security property with name "jdk.security.providers.filter". This > process occurs at sun.security.jca.ProvidersFilter class —simply referred as > ProvidersFilter onward— static initialization. Thus, changes to the filter's > overridable property are not effective afterwards and no assumptions should > be made regarding when this class gets initialized. > > The filter's string value is processed with a custom parser of order 'n', > being 'n' the number of characters. The parser, represented by the > ProvidersFilter.Parser class, can be characterized as a Deterministic Finite > Automaton (DFA). The ProvidersFilter.Parser::parse method is the starting > point to get characters from the filter's string value and generate state > transitions in the parser's internal state-machine. See > ProvidersFilter.Parser::nextState for more details about the parser's states > and both valid and invalid transitions. The ParsingState enum defines valid > parser states and Transition the reasons to move between states. If a filter > string cannot be parsed, a ProvidersFilter.ParserException exception is > thrown, and turned into an unchecked IllegalArgumentException in the > ProvidersFilter.Filter constructor. > > While we analyzed —and even tried, at early stages of the development— the > use of regular expressions for filter parsing, we discarded the approach in > order to get maximum performance, support a more advanced syntax and have > flexibility for further extensions in the future. > > ### Filter (structure and behavior) > > A filter is represented by the ProvidersFilter.Filter class. It consists of > an ordered list of rules, returned by the parser, that represents filter > patterns from left to right (see the filter syntax for reference). At the end > of this list, a match-all and deny rule is added for default behavior. When a > service is evaluated against the filter, each filter rule is checked in the > ProvidersFilter.Filter::apply method. The rule makes an allow or deny > decision if the ser...
Martin Balao has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains two new commits since the last revision: - 8315487: Security Providers Filter Co-authored-by: Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet <fferr...@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Martin Balao <mba...@redhat.com> - 8345139: Fix bugs and inconsistencies in the Provider services map Co-authored-by: Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet <fferr...@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Martin Balao <mba...@redhat.com> ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15539/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15539/files/f3c5e580..96709e3f Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15539&range=15 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=15539&range=14-15 Stats: 0 lines in 0 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 0 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15539.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15539/head:pull/15539 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15539